Comparative analysis between STANDARD-E Covi-FERON ELISA with pre-existing IFN-γ release assays and determination of the optimum cutoff value for assessment of T-Cell response to SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs) are useful for the assessment of the T-cell response to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). We aimed to assess the performance of the newly developed IGRA ELISA test compared to the pre-existing assays and to validate the cutoff value in real-world conditions. METHODS: We enrolled 219 participants and assessed agreement between STANDARD-E Covi-FERON ELISA with Quanti-FERON SARS-CoV-2 (QFN SARS-CoV-2), as well as with T SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2 based on Cohen's kappa-index. We further determined the optimal cutoff value for the Covi-FERON ELISA according to the immune response to vaccinations or infections. RESULTS: We found a moderate agreement between Covi-FERON ELISA and QFN SARS-CoV-2 before vaccination (kappa-index = 0.71), whereas a weak agreement after the first (kappa-index = 0.40) and second vaccinations (kappa-index = 0.46). However, the analysis between Covi-FERON ELISA and T SPOT assay demonstrated a strong agreement (kappa-index >0.7). The cut-off value of the OS (original spike) marker was 0.759 IU/mL with a sensitivity of 96.3% and specificity of 78.7%, and that of the variant spike (VS) marker was 0.663 IU/mL with a sensitivity and specificity of 77.8% and 80.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The newly determined cut-off value may provide an optimum value to minimize and prevent the occurrence of false-negative or false-positive during the assessment of T-cell immune response using Covi-FERON ELISA under real-world conditions.

Diagnostic Performance of Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) for Cell-Mediated Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: As SARS-CoV-2 infection became a pandemic, much effort has been made to measure both antibody production and T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 to diagnose COVID-19 patients or find out their immune status. Authors tried to determine the optimal cutoff value and evaluate clinical performance of one interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) kit and compared their results with serological antibody assay in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Study subjects included 100 patients confirmed as COVID-19 with RT-PCR method and 88 healthy volunteers who were PCR negative. IGRA tests were performed using STANDARDTM E Covi-FERON ELISA. Presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was detected using STANDARD Q COVID-19 IgM/IgG Plus Test. Cutoff value was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The cutoff value was 0.24 IU/mL and the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve was 0.973 with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.940 - 1.005. At this cutoff value, sensitivity and specificity were 91.7% and 100%, respectively. In addition, when compared with antibody test, concordance rate was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: STANDARDTM E Covi-FERON ELISA showed high sensitivity and specificity, when the cutoff value was 0.24 IU/mL. It was also consistent with the antibody test. IGRA test was a good indicator of cellular immune response in COVID-19 patients.

Evaluation of QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 interferon-γ release assay following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.

T cells are important in preventing severe disease from SARS-CoV-2, but scalable and field-adaptable alternatives to expert T-cell assays are needed. The interferon-gamma release assay QuantiFERON platform was developed to detect T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 from whole blood with relatively basic equipment and flexibility of processing timelines. Forty-eight participants with different infection and vaccination backgrounds were recruited. Whole blood samples were analysed using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay in parallel with the well-established 'Protective Immunity from T Cells in Healthcare workers' (PITCH) ELISpot, which can evaluate spike-specific T-cell responses. The primary aims of this cross-sectional observational cohort study were to establish if the QuantiFERON SARS-Co-V-2 assay could discern differences between specified groups and to assess the sensitivity of the assay compared with the PITCH ELISpot. The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 distinguished acutely infected individuals (12-21 days post positive PCR) from naïve individuals (P < 0.0001) with 100% sensitivity and specificity for SARS-CoV-2 T cells, whilst the PITCH ELISpot had reduced sensitivity (62.5%) for the acute infection group. Sensitivity with QuantiFERON for previous infection was 12.5% (172-444 days post positive test) and was inferior to the PITCH ELISpot (75%). Although the QuantiFERON assay could discern differences between unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals (55-166 days since second vaccination), the latter also had reduced sensitivity (44.4%) compared to the PITCH ELISpot (66.6%). The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay showed potential as a T- cell evaluation tool soon after SARS-CoV-2 infection but has lower sensitivity for use in reliable evaluation of vaccination or more distant infection.

First evaluation of the performance of portable IGRA, QIAreach® QuantiFERON®-TB in intermediate TB incidence setting.

Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis infection (TBI) are the core elements of tuberculosis elimination. Interferon gamma release assays have advantages over the tuberculin skin test, although their implementation in low-resource settings is challenging. The performance of a novel digital lateral flow assay QIAreach® QuantiFERON®-TB (QIAreach QFT) against the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay was evaluated in an intermediate incidence setting (Malaysia) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Individuals aged 4-82 years, who were candidates for TB infection screening for contact investigation were prospectively recruited. On 196 samples, the QIAreach-QFT showed a positive percent agreement (sensitivity) was 96.5% (CI 87.9-99.6%), a negative percent agreement (specificity) 94.2% (CI 88.4% to 97.6%) and an overall percentage of agreement was 94.9% (95% CI 90.6-97.6%) with a Cohen's κ of 0,88. Out of 196, 5.6% (11/196) samples gave an error result on QIAreach-QFT and 4.1% (8/196) samples gave indeterminate result on QFT-plus. The TTR for QIAreach QFT positive samples varied from 210-1200 seconds (20 min) and significantly correlated with IFN-γ level of QFT-Plus. QIAreach QFT could be considered an accurate and reliable point-of-need test to diagnose TB infection helping to achieve the WHO End TB programme goals even in decentralised settings where laboratory expertise and infrastructure may be limited.

Performance of an interferon-γ release assay-based test for cell-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

In search for immunological correlates of protection against acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) there is a need for high through-put assays for cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We established an interferon-γ release assay -based test for detection of CMI against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) or nucleocapsid (NC) peptides. Blood samples obtained from 549 healthy or convalescent individuals were measured for interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production after peptide stimulation using a certified chemiluminescence immunoassay. Test performance was calculated applying cutoff values with the highest Youden indices in receiver-operating-characteristics curve analysis and compared to a commercially available serologic test. Potential confounders and clinical correlates were assessed for all test systems. 522 samples obtained from 378 convalescent in median 298 days after PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and 144 healthy control individuals were included in the final analysis. CMI testing had a sensitivity and specificity of up to 89% and 74% for S peptides and 89% and 91% for NC peptides, respectively. High white blood cell counts correlated negatively with IFN-γ responses but there was no CMI decay in samples obtained up to one year after recovery. Severe clinical symptoms at time of acute infection were associated with higher measures of adaptive immunity and reported hair loss at time of examination. This laboratory-developed test for CMI to SARS-CoV-2 NC peptides exhibits excellent test performance, is suitable for high through-put routine diagnostics, and should be evaluated for clinical outcome prediction in prospective pathogen re-exposure.

Long-Term Accuracy of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Interferon-γ Release Assay and Its Application in Household Investigation.

BACKGROUND: An immunodiagnostic assay that sensitively detects a cell-mediated immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is needed for epidemiological investigation and for clinical assessment of T- cell-mediated immune response to vaccines, particularly in the context of emerging variants that might escape antibody responses. METHODS: The performance of a whole blood interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific T cells was evaluated in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescents tested serially up to 10 months post-infection and in healthy blood donors. SARS-CoV-2 IGRA was applied in contacts of households with index cases. Freshly collected blood in the lithium heparin tube was left unstimulated, stimulated with a SARS-CoV-2 peptide pool, and stimulated with mitogen. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of IGRA were 84.5% (153/181; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.0-89.0) and 86.6% (123/142; 95% CI: 80.0-91.2), respectively. The sensitivity declined from 100% (16/16; 95% CI: 80.6-100) at 0.5-month post-infection to 79.5% (31/39; 95% CI: 64.4-89.2) at 10 months post-infection (P < .01). The IFN-γ response remained relatively robust at 10 months post-infection (3.8 vs 1.3 IU/mL, respectively). In 14 households, IGRA showed a positivity rate of 100% (12/12) and 65.2% (15/23), and IgG of 50.0% (6/12) and 43.5% (10/23) in index cases and contacts, respectively, exhibiting a difference of + 50% (95% CI: +25.4 to +74.6) and +21.7% (95% CI: +9.23 to +42.3), respectively. Either IGRA or IgG was positive in 100% (12/12) of index cases and 73.9% (17/23) of contacts. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 IGRA is a useful clinical diagnostic tool for assessing cell-mediated immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

Clinical Performance of a Standardized Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Interferon-γ Release Assay for Simple Detection of T-Cell Responses After Infection or Vaccination.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a standardized interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) for detection of T-cell immune response after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or vaccination. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with different severity of illness and follow-up (FU), vaccinated subjects, and healthy unvaccinated persons. SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was measured using a specific quantitative IGRA in whole blood (Euroimmun, Germany) and TrimericS-IgG and neutralizing antibodies with validated serological platforms. Positivity of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or vaccination was considered as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 239 individuals were included (152 convalescent, 54 vaccinated, and 33 uninfected unvaccinated). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values (95% confidence interval) of the IGRA were 81.1% (74.9-86%), 90.9% (74.5-97.6%), 98.2% (94.5-99.5%), and 43.5% (31.8-55.9%), respectively. All vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naive subjects had positive IGRA at 3 months. In convalescent subjects the magnitude of IFN-γ responses and IGRA accuracy varied according to disease severity and duration of FU, with the best performance in patients with severe COVID-19 at 3 months and the worst in those with mild disease at 12 months. The greatest contribution of IGRA to serological tests was observed in patients with mild disease and long-term FU (incremental difference, 30.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The IGRA was a reliable method of quantifying T-cell response after SARS-COV-2 infection or vaccination. In convalescent patients, the sensitivity is largely dependent on disease severity and time since primary infection. The assay is more likely to add clinical value to serology in patients with mild infections.

Evaluation of ichroma™ COVID-19 interferon gamma release assay for detection of vaccine-induced immunity in healthcare workers.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the performance of a new interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) format assay, the ichroma™ COVID-19 IGRA (IGRA-SARS), with that of the widely used QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 ELISA kit (QFN-SARS) in vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs). Additionally, we analyzed the long-term changes in IGRA results after the final vaccine dose. METHODS: A total of 383 specimens from 281 HCWs were enrolled in this study, and the results of SARS-IGRA and QFN-SARS assays were compared. In addition, we performed the receive operator curve analysis to estimate the optimal cut-off value for IGRA-SARS. RESULTS: For all specimens, IGRA-SARS and QFN-SARS showed 75.7% and 64.2% of the positive results, respectively. The absolute agreement between IGRA-SARS and QFN-SARS was 80.0%, and the Fleiss' κ value was 0.525, indicating moderate agreement. ROC curve analysis of the IGRA-SARS results showed a cut-off value of >0.254 IU/mL, which was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications. The positive rates of both IGRA assays decreased significantly after a postvaccination period of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: IGRA-SARS showed acceptable performance in the detection of vaccine-induced immunity against COVID-19; however, harmonization of IGRA assays has not yet been achieved. Additionally, the significant decline of positive rates of IGRA after the last vaccination would support the necessity of booster vaccination after a postvaccination period of 6 months.

Accuracy of QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay and characterization of the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-SARS-CoV-2 response: comparison with a homemade interferon-γ release assay.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to characterize the SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response detected by the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay in terms of accuracy and T cell subsets involved compared with a homemade interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (IGRA). METHODS: We evaluated T cell response by the standardized QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 tubes (antigen [Ag]1 and Ag2) and a homemade IGRA quantifying IFN-γ response to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides (homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test). We evaluated the T cell subsets mediating the specific response using flow cytometry. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 66 individuals: COVID-19 or post-COVID-19 subjects and NO-COVID-19-vaccinated subjects, including healthy donors and immunocompromised subjects. The standardized kit detected 62.1% (41/66) of T cell responders. Ag2 tube showed a higher IFN-γ quantitative and qualitative response. Ag1 tube response was mainly mediated by CD4+ T cells; Ag2 tube response was mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test detected a higher number of responders (52/66, 78.8%) than the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (P = 0.056). The response was found in both T cell subsets, although a higher magnitude and response rate was observed in the CD4+ T cell subset. CONCLUSION: The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 response is mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. A lower number of responders is found compared with the homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test, likely because of the different peptide composition.

Childhood tuberculosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We discuss the most recent literature to support the identification of children at risk for tuberculosis and optimal testing and treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: The identification and management of children with tuberculosis has increased in complexity due to the recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic, greater use of immunosuppressive agents, and the administration of shorter, rifamycin-containing treatment regimens. Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in children include: use of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs); molecular-based tests; and shorter courses of treatment. While the essential steps to identify and treat children at risk for tuberculosis remain unchanged, providers must be aware of impact of these challenges. SUMMARY: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will likely have a negative impact on global tuberculosis control. It is important that countries maintain a comprehensive approach to the identification and management of children at risk for tuberculosis. Increasing evidence supports enhanced utilization of IGRAs and molecular-based testing to improve the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children. Shorter course, rifamycin-based treatment regimens are available to treat children with tuberculosis infection; however, their use is limited in some immunosuppressed children due to drug-drug interactions.

Changes in interferon-γ release assay readout after COVID-19 vaccination: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) are widely used in public health practice to diagnose latent tuberculosis. During the COVID-19 pandemic and rollout of COVID-19 vaccination, it has remained unclear whether COVID-19 vaccines interfere with IGRA readouts. METHODS: We prospectively recruited healthcare workers during their annual occupational health examinations in 2021. Baseline IGRA readouts were compared with follow-up data after the participants had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 134 baseline IGRA-negative cases (92 with ChAdOx1 vaccine, 27 with mRNA-1273 vaccine, and 15 with heterologous vaccination) and seven baseline IGRA-positive cases were analyzed. Among the baseline IGRA-negative cases, there were decreased interferon-γ concentrations over the Nil (P = 0.005) and increased Mitogen-Nil (P < 0.001) values after vaccination. For TB2-Nil value, a similar trend (P = 0.057) of increase was observed. Compared with the 0.35 IU/ml threshold, the baseline and follow-up readout differences were less than |± 0.10| IU/ml over the TB1-Nil and TB2-Nil values in >90% baseline IGRA-negative cases. No significant readout difference was observed among baseline IGRA-positive cases. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination did not change IGRA interpretation in most cases. Cases showing conversion/borderline IGRA readouts should be given special consideration.

Humoral and Cellular Responses to BNT162b2 as a Booster Following Two Doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Determined Using Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays and an Interferon-Gamma Release Assay: A Prospective Longitudinal Study in Healthcare Workers.

Data on humoral and cellular responses to BNT162b2 as a booster dose, following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine, have seldom been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the positivity rates of three representative antibody assays targeting total, IgG, and neutralizing antibodies, and an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), and to determine the longitudinal changes in quantitative antibody titers after each vaccination. A total of 1027 samples were collected from healthcare workers. The number of participants after the booster dose was 153, and they all completed a questionnaire on adverse reactions. All antibody assays showed 100.0% positivity at 1 month after booster vaccination. The median antibody titers of the assays were significantly increased compared with those after the second dose (22.1-fold increase for Roche total antibody, 14.0-fold increase for Abbott IgG, and 1.1-fold increase (97.5% inhibition) for GenScript neutralizing antibody). Cellular responses determined using the IGRA were positive in 92.8% of the participants. Most participants (72.5%) reported mild adverse reactions. Correlations between the three antibody assays and IGRA were weak or negligible, indicating a difference between humoral and cellular responses. Overall, our study provides information about booster vaccine strategies and laboratory settings, which could subsequently contribute to the control of the spread of coronavirus disease 2019.

Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among pre-clinical and clinical medical students using QuantiFERON-TB gold plus and tuberculin skin test at a teaching hospital in Thailand: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are considered to be at a higher risk of acquiring tuberculosis (TB) infection than the general population. Clinical medical students are part of the healthcare team and clinical practice are done during their clinical rotation. They could be exposed to similar occupational risks as the healthcare workers. Most students who become infected have latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and may not exhibit any clinical symptoms. Some students with LTBI can progress to TB disease during clinical rotations in the hospitals. Therefore, screening for LTBI in this population represents hospital aspect of public health strategy and infection control in medical school in high TB burden countries. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the prevalence of LTBI among fourth-year medical students and sixth-year medical students by using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and Tuberculin Skin Test (TST). METHODS: A cross-sectional study of fourth-year medical students (n = 73) and sixth-year medical students (n = 85) was conducted at the School of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. The medical students (n = 158) who met the eligibility criteria were recruited into the study. LTBI was detected by using QFT-Plus and some of the participants had a tuberculin skin test (TST). The TST was interpreted after 48-72 h. The participants who tested positive by QFT-Plus were considered to have LTBI. Demographic information and data on occupational TB exposure were collected via a questionnaire. A multivariate logistic regression was used to test for associations between independent variables and results of the QFT-Plus. RESULTS: A total of 158 participants were included in this study. The overall prevalence of LTBI was 6.3% (n = 10) as determined by QFT-Plus. The LTBI prevalence was higher in the sixth-year medical students (9.4%) compared to the fourth-year medical students (2.7%). Higher risk of LTBI was associated with sixth-year medical students (odds ratio, 3.69 [95%CI, 0.75-17.96]), but this was not significant. Moreover, history of occupational TB exposure without PPE yielded an odds ratio of 2.98 [95%CI, 0.68-13.12] but it was not statistically significant due to the small sample size. One hundred thirty-nine (88%) participants were BCG vaccinated as per the national vaccination requirements. No abnormal chest X-rays were found for any of the positive participants. Of the 158 participants, 41 (25.9%) of them had TST. Of the 41 participants, 6 (14.6%) tested positive at a cut-off of ≥ 10 mm for TST, which was concordant with QFT-Plus results. The agreement between the two tests was 0.57 using kappa coefficients. CONCLUSION: The screening of TB infection in new healthcare workers (HCWs), especially medical students, is essential to reduce future nosocomial TB incidences in the hospitals. This study showed that there was a high prevalence of LTBI among sixth-year medical students compared to fourth-year medical students. Our results suggest that tendency of higher LTBI prevalence might be associated with advanced clinical years, thus tailored public health education strategy and infection control in tertiary care hospitals for new healthcare workers in TB endemic countries may prevent nosocomial TB disease from developing in the future. Therefore, active surveillance should be done for all new HCWs, and TB preventive therapy should be administered to recent converters.

Predicting Airborne Infection Risk: Association Between Personal Ambient Carbon Dioxide Level Monitoring and Incidence of Tuberculosis Infection in South African Health Workers.

BACKGROUND: High rates of tuberculosis (TB) transmission occur in hospitals in high-incidence countries, yet there is no validated way to evaluate the impact of hospital design and function on airborne infection risk. We hypothesized that personal ambient carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring could serve as a surrogate measure of rebreathed air exposure associated with TB infection risk in health workers (HWs). METHODS: We analyzed baseline and repeat (12-month) interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) results in 138 HWs in Cape Town, South Africa. A random subset of HWs with a baseline negative QuantiFERON Plus (QFT-Plus) underwent personal ambient CO2 monitoring. RESULTS: Annual incidence of TB infection (IGRA conversion) was high (34%). Junior doctors were less likely to have a positive baseline IGRA than other HWs (OR, 0.26; P = .005) but had similar IGRA conversion risk. IGRA converters experienced higher median CO2 levels compared to IGRA nonconverters using quantitative QFT-Plus thresholds of ≥0.35 IU/mL (P < .02) or ≥1 IU/mL (P < .01). Median CO2 levels were predictive of IGRA conversion (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; P = .04, ≥1 IU/mL threshold). Ordinal logistic regression demonstrated that the odds of a higher repeat quantitative IGRA result increased by almost 2-fold (OR, 1.81; P = .01) per 100 ppm unit increase in median CO2 levels, suggesting a dose-dependent response. CONCLUSIONS: HWs face high occupational TB risk. Increasing median CO2 levels (indicative of poor ventilation and/or high occupancy) were associated with higher likelihood of HW TB infection. Personal ambient CO2 monitoring may help target interventions to decrease TB transmission in healthcare facilities and help HWs self-monitor occupational risk, with implications for other airborne infections including coronavirus disease 2019.

Novel T cell interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) using spike recombinant protein for COVID19 vaccine response and Nucleocapsid for SARS-Cov2 response.

We explored the performance of a whole blood interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) based on the stimulation of SARS-Cov2-specific T cells by purified recombinant proteins. Twenty volunteers vaccinated with BNT162b2 were selected first for T cell response evaluation using an in-house IGRA, a commercial IGRA, and ELISpot showing a S2 > S1 poly-epitopic response. Next, 64 vaccinated and 103 non-vaccinated individuals were tested for humoral and T cell response (IGRA-Spike/-nucleocapsid recombinant proteins). Following the second vaccine injection, humoral (100%) and IGRA-Spike T cell (95.3%) responses took place irrespective of sex, age, and vaccine type. The humoral response declined first, followed by IGRA-Spike T cell response after the second vaccine injection. Altogether, this study confirms the utility of the IGRA-Spike/-nucleocapsid assay to complement serology in COVID19 vaccinated individuals and those who have recovered from SARS-Cov2.

Accuracy and real life performance of a novel interferon-γ release assay for the detection of SARS-CoV2 specific T cell response.

BACKGROUND: The reliable detection of T cell response to COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccination is important for individual patient care and for monitoring the immune response e.g. in COVID-19 vaccine trials in a standardized fashion. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: We used blood samples from health care workers (HCW) with or without history of COVID-19 to define test accuracy of a novel interferon-γ release assay (IGRA). For a real-life performance evaluation, we analysed interferon-γ response to complete COVID-19 vaccination in HCW receiving homologous or heterologous vaccination regimens and in patients receiving immunosuppressive or immune modulating therapies. RESULTS: The assay had a specificity of 100%. Sensitivity of the IGRA to detect past infection was 72.2% after infection more than 5 months ago and 93.8% after COVID-19 up to 5 months ago. Quantitative results showed significant differences between first and second vaccine dose, but no difference between homologous and heterologous vaccination regimen. Immunocompromised patients often had no immune response or isolated T cell or antibody response to complete vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The novel IGRA proved to be a highly specific tool to detect SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response to COVID-19 as well as COVID-19 vaccination, with sensitivity getting lower over time. In perspective, it may serve as a standardized tool in COVID-19 vaccine trials and in clinical care of immunosuppressed patients.

Clinical and Epidemiological Correlates of Low IFN-Gamma Responses in Mitogen Tube of QuantiFERON Assay in Tuberculosis Infection Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Population-Based Marker of COVID-19 Mortality?

Background: The clinical and epidemiological implications of abnormal immune responses in COVID-19 for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening are unclear. Methods: We reviewed QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) results (36,709 patients) from July 2016 until October 2021 in Asturias (Spain). We also studied a cohort of ninety hospitalized patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and a group of elderly hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who underwent serial QFT-Plus and immune profiling testing. Results: The indeterminate QFT-Plus results rate went from 1.4% (July 2016 to November 2019) to 4.2% during the COVID-19 pandemic. The evolution of the number of cases with low/very low interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) response in the mitogen tube paralleled the disease activity and number of deaths during the pandemic waves in our region (from March 2020 to October 2021). The percentages of positive QFT-plus patients did not significantly change before and during the pandemic (13.9% vs. 12.2%). Forty-nine patients from the suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia cohort (54.4%) had low/very low IFN-gamma response to mitogen, 22 of them (24.4%) had severe and critical pneumonia. None received immunosuppressants prior to testing. Abnormal radiological findings (P = 0.01) but not COVID-19 severity was associated with low mitogen response. Immune profiling showed a reduction of CD8 + T cells and a direct correlation between the number of EMRA CD8 + T-cells and IFN-gamma response to mitogen (P = 0.03). Conclusion: Low IFN-gamma responses in mitogen tube of QFT-Plus often occur in COVID-19 pneumonia, which is associated with a low number of an effector CD8 + T-cell subset and does not seem to affect LTBI screening; however, this abnormality seems to parallel the dynamics of COVID-19 at the population level and its mortality.

Accuracy of interferon gamma release assays for the COVID-19 immunity assessment.

Emerging evidence suggests that T-cells play a significant role in COVID-19 immunity both in the context of natural infection and vaccination. Easy to use IGRA assays including QFN SARS are considered attractive alternatives to more "traditional" but laborious methods for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses. In our Letter we are proposing explanations to an apparently lower than expected T-cell responses (44 % reactive individuals) reported by Krüttgen et al in a small cohort of healthy double vaccinated individuals. These results could have been affected by reporting raw optical density values instead of calculated Interferon-É£ concentrations which is supported by unexpectedly low mitogen responses in healthy individuals. This study highlights an importance of adhering to good laboratory practice principles as well as overall importance of accurate T-cell immunity assessment using IGRA assays.